Gaëtan Hart: an intriguing book

I was reading the first pages of Mélanie Hart’s book. My father, Gaëtan Hart, and I felt uneasy.

I wondered what the process started by Mélanie Hart and her collaborator Serge Amyot was all about. In fact, it looked like the start of a long therapy, a painful walk by a girl to try to find a father.

But with the feeling that it was necessary to start by destroying the man before arriving at love.

So much so that I spoke to Gaëtan Hart three times while reading the book. As if to reassure me that everything had gone well.

All three times, Gaëtan has been the Gaëtan that I have always known for over 40 years. The Gaëtan whose painful fights I covered against Ralph Racine, left paralyzed in the ring in the 11th round, and Cleveland Denny, who was to die a few days after his fight at Olympic Stadium on June 20, 1980.

The Gaëtan Hart whom I accompanied to Cincinnati in the fall of 80 for his world championship fight against the gifted Aaron Pryor.

The Gaëtan Hart who accepts all the misery he has eaten because it has also given him glory and shots adrenaline that nothing else in life could give him.

In her very well-written book, Mélanie Hart is right. Boxing was the love, the mistress, the passion that consumed everything in his father’s soul.


Then, I moved on through the book. Discovering on every page that the writing was beautiful, simple and generous.

And that the display of the black pages of Gaëtan Hart’s life led Mélanie to something else. Like a quest.

I was oscillating between two lives that were told to me. That of the father, the boxer with his glory and his misery, and that of the daughter, sometimes very hard in her quest to know a father, and at other times generous in her indulgence.

With this intriguing impossibility of never being sure of what came from Mélanie Hart’s eight years of work and what was the contribution of Serge Amyot, her collaborator.

I took two hours with Amyot, a former Newspaper. He was the one who screwed up the fine, established order of the book. Mélanie recounted all of Gaëtan Hart’s fights without ever engaging: “I told her to tell what she was looking for in this book. I wanted it to be his approach, his research. It changed everything, ”Amyot said.

He is right. This is no longer a boxing book for connoisseurs or fans. This is a book for women, for children, for anyone interested in following a desperate search for love.

But it must have been painful and painful for Gaëtan Hart to read the proofs before printing his “biography”. There is a limit for a man to be put on his face his four truths.


I obviously chatted for a long time with Mélanie Hart. She assumes her book as Gaëtan Hart assumes his life. She’s not talking about therapy. She speaks of a deep desire to know a man, his father, and such an urgent need to tell the truth. So that Buckingham, his village, never forgets who Gaëtan Hart was.

Buckingham and all of Quebec.

Mélanie Hart has long refused to bear the name Hart. She was Melanie, period. All the research she has done has nourished every fleeting memory of her four or five years. She reviewed her childhood through the articles and interviews she discovered. Then Serge Amyot, who fell in love with this book, always pushed it further. Stressed her with her questions.

The result is astonishing. It’s a very good book. But this is a book that hurts. Because if Gaëtan Hart is a legend in Buckingham and in the Outaouais, and for a Quebec that remembers him, for Mélanie Hart, he is the source of pain. His, his brother’s, his mother’s.

But at the same time, two paragraphs later, we understand that she has made peace with this past. You can feel love pointing out.

That’s anything but trivial.

Donato defends Danault

Donato Tamarazo is one of the bosses of Lezvos in Saint-Sauveur. A sports enthusiast: baseball, football, boxing, hockey, all sports. But the ultimate passion is his Canadian. It must be said that Donato is starting to think that 27 years without a Stanley Cup final is a bit long.

Brendan Gallagher signed a very lucrative contract in Montreal. But Marc Bergevin does not seem in a great hurry to settle the Phillip Danault case.

Donato took his best pen and wrote to Bergevin yesterday:

“Here are the reasons why Montreal should sign Phillip Danault. He is our best center player. He’s very good at faceoffs in the defensive zone. He can play in attack with five or at a disadvantage. He is a guy who never complains and also he is respected by his teammates and the opponents.

“He’s also a good Quebecer and God knows we don’t have a lot with the Habs. So, Mr. Bergevin, please our supporters and sign Phillip Danault with a nice contract. I’m telling you, in Chicago, we regret having traded. Let’s keep it. Do not make the same mistake as Radulov’s.

– Donato Tamarazo ”

It’s simple.

Hello, Geoff … it’s the people talking.

Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *